H2B histone gene expression during {\it Xenopus laevis\/} development

Histone gene expression is replication-independent during oogenesis and early embryogenesis in amphibians; however, it becomes replication-dependent during later embryogenesis and remains replication-dependent through adulthood. In order to understand the mechanism for this switch in transcriptional regulation of histone gene expression during amphibian development, linker-scanning mutations were made in a Xenopus laevis H2B histone gene promoter by oligonucleotide site-directed mutagenesis and assayed by microinjection into oocytes and embryos. The Xenopus H2B gene has a relatively simple promoter containing several transcriptional regulatory elements, including TFIID, CCAAT, and ATF motifs, required for maximal transcription in both oocytes and embryos. Factors binding to the CCAAT and ATF motifs are present in oocytes and embryos and increase slightly in abundance during early development. A sequence (CTTTACAT) in the frog H2B promoter resembling the conserved octamer motif (ATTTGCAT), the target for cell-cycle regulation of a human H2B gene, is additionally required for maximal H2B transcription in frog embryos. Oocytes and embryos contain multiple octamer-binding proteins that are expressed in a sequential manner during early development. Sequences encoding three novel octamer-binding proteins were isolated from Xenopus cDNA libraries by virtue of their similarity with the DNA binding (POU) domain of the ubiquitously expressed transcription factor Oct-1. The protein encoded by one of these genes, termed Oct-60, was localized mainly in the cytoplasm of oocytes and was also present in early embryos until the gastrula stage of development. Proteins encoded by the other two genes, Oct-25 and Oct-91, were present in embryos after the mid-blastula stage of development and decreased by early neurula stage. The activity of the Xenopus H2B octamer motif in embryos is not specifically associated with increased binding by Oct-1 or the appearance of novel octamer-binding proteins but requires the presence of an intact CCAAT motif. We found that synergistic interactions among promoter elements are important for full H2B promoter activity. The results suggest that transcription of the Xenopus H2B gene is replication-dependent when it is activated at the mid-blastula stage of development and that replication-dependent H2B transcription is mediated by Oct-1. ^

XENOESTROGEN-SPECIFIC MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENTAL REPROGRAMMING CORRELATE WITH GENE EXPRESSION AND TUMOR DEVELOPMENT

Environmental exposures during sensitive windows of development can reprogram normal physiological responses and alter disease susceptibility later in life in a process known as developmental reprogramming. We have shown that neonatal exposure to the xenoestrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES) can developmentally reprogram the reproductive tract in genetically susceptible Eker rats giving rise to complete penetrance of uterine leiomyoma. Based on this, we hypothesized that xenoestrogens, including genistein (GEN) and bisphenol A (BPA), reprogram estrogen-responsive gene expression in the myometrium and promote the development of uterine leiomyoma. We proposed the mechanism that is responsible for the developmental reprogramming of gene expression was through estrogen (E2)/ xenoestrogen inducedrapid ER signaling, which modifies the histone methyltransferase Enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) via activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. We further hypothesized that there is a xenostrogen-specific effect on this pathway altering patterns of histone modification, DNA methylation and gene expression. In addition to our novel finding that E2/DES-induced phosphorylation of EZH2 by AKT reduces the levels of H3K27me3 in vitro and in vivo, this work demonstrates in vivo that a brief neonatal exposure to GEN, in contrast to BPA, activates the PI3K/AKT pathway to regulate EZH2 and decreases H3K27me3 levels in the neonatal uterus. Given that H3K27me3 is a repressive mark that has been shown to result in DNA methylation and gene silencing we investigated the methylation of developmentally reprogrammed genes. In support of this evidence, we show that neonatal DES exposure in comparison to VEH, leads to hypomethylation of the promoter of a developmentally reprogrammed gene, Gria2, that become hyper-responsive to estrogen in the adult myometrium indicating vi that DES exposure alter gene expression via chromatin remodeling and loss of DNA methylation. In the adult uterus, GEN and BPA exposure developmentally reprogrammed expression of estrogen-responsive genes in a manner opposite of one another, correlating with our previous data. Furthermore, the ability of GEN and BPA to developmental reprogram gene expression correlated with tumor incidence and multiplicity. These data show that xenoestrogens have unique effects on the activation of non-genomic signaling in the developing uterus that promotes epigenetic and genetic alterations, which are predictive of developmental reprogramming and correlate with their ability to modulate hormone-dependent tumor development.

Role of NonO-histone interaction in TNFalpha-suppressed prolyl-4-hydroxylase alpha1.

Inflammation is a key process in cardiovascular diseases. The extracellular matrix (ECM) of the vasculature is a major target of inflammatory cytokines, and TNFalpha regulates ECM metabolism by affecting collagen production. In this study, we have examined the pathways mediating TNFalpha-induced suppression of prolyl-4 hydroxylase alpha1 (P4Halpha1), the rate-limiting isoform of P4H responsible for procollagen hydroxylation, maturation, and organization. Using human aortic smooth muscle cells, we found that TNFalpha activated the MKK4-JNK1 pathway, which induced histone (H) 4 lysine 12 acetylation within the TNFalpha response element in the P4Halpha1 promoter. The acetylated-H4 then recruited a transcription factor, NonO, which, in turn, recruited HDACs and induced H3 lysine 9 deacetylation, thereby inhibiting transcription of the P4Halpha1 promoter. Furthermore, we found that TNFalpha oxidized DJ-1, which may be essential for the NonO-P4Halpha1 interaction because treatment with gene specific siRNA to knockout DJ-1 eliminated the TNFalpha-induced NonO-P4Halpha1 interaction and its suppression. Our findings may be relevant to aortic aneurysm and dissection and the stability of the fibrous cap of atherosclerotic plaque in which collagen metabolism is important in arterial remodeling. Defining this cytokine-mediated regulatory pathway may provide novel molecular targets for therapeutic intervention in preventing plaque rupture and acute coronary occlusion.

DEFINITION OF THE LANDSCAPE OF CHROMATIN STRUCTURE AT THE FRATAXIN GENE IN FRIEDREICH’S ATAXIA

Friedreich’s ataxia (FRDA) is caused by the transcriptional silencing of the frataxin (FXN) gene. FRDA patients have expansion of GAA repeats in intron 1 of the FXN gene in both alleles. A number of studies demonstrated that specific histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) affect either histone modifications at the FXN gene or FXN expression in FRDA cells, indicating that the hyperexpanded GAA repeat may facilitate heterochromatin formation. However, the correlation between chromatin structure and transcription at the FXN gene is currently limited due to a lack of more detailed analysis. Therefore, I analyzed the effects of the hyperexpanded GAA repeats on transcription status and chromatin structure using lymphoid cell lines derived from FRDA patients. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation and quantitative PCR, I observed significant changes in the landscape of histone modifications in the vicinity of the GAA tract in FRDA cells relative to control cells. Similar epigenetic changes were observed in GFP reporter construct containing 560 GAA repeats. Further, I detected similar levels of FXN pre-mRNA at a region upstream of hyperexpanded GAA repeats in FRDA and control cells, indicating similar efficiency of transcription initiation in FRDA cells. I also showed that histone modifications associated with hyperexpanded GAA repeats are independent of transcription progression using the GFP reporter system. My data strongly support evidence that FXN deficiency in FRDA patients is consequence of defective transition from initiation to elongation of FXN transcription due to heterochromatin-like structures formed in the proximity of the hyperexpanded GAAs.

CHARACTERIZATION OF HIGH MOBILITY GROUP AND HISTONE H1 PROTEIN LEVELS AND SYNTHESIS DURING SPERMATOGENESIS IN THE RAT

In order to propose a role for internucleosomal high mobility group proteins (HMGs), and HI histone variants study of their levels and synthesis in a system of development and differentiation--rat spermatogenesis--was undertaken. HMG1, 2, 14, and 17 were isolated from rat testes and found to be very similar to calf thymus HMGs. Testis levels of HMGs, relative to DNA, were equivalent to other rat tissues for HMG1 (13 ug/mg DNA), HMG14 (2 ug/mg DNA), and HMG17 (5 ug/mg DNA). HMG2 levels were different among rat tissues, with three groups observed: (1) nonproliferating tissues (1-5 ug/mg DNA); (2) proliferating tissues (8-13 ug/mg DNA); and (3) the testis (32 ug/mg DNA). Other species (toad, opposum, mouse, dog, and monkey) showed the same testis-specific increase of HMG2. Populations of purified testis cell types were separated by centrifugal elutriation and density gradient centrifugation from adult and immature rat testes. Pachytene spermatocytes and early spermatids (56 and 47 ug/mg DNA, respectively) caused the testis-specific increase of HMG2 levels. Cell types preceding pachytenes (types A and B spermatogonia, mixtures of spermatogonia and early primary spermatocytes, and early pachytenes contained HMG2 levels similar to proliferating tissues (12 ug/mg DNA). Late spermatids did not contain HMGs. Somatic Sertoli and Leydig cells (2 ug/mg DNA) exhibited HMG2 levels similar to nonproliferating tissues. HMGs synthesized in spermatogonia and spermatocytes had similar specific activities, but early spermatids did not synthesize HMGs. Germ cells also contained an HMG2 species (on acid-urea gels) not found in somatic tissues. Other investigators have shown that HMGs may be associated with transcriptional or replicative processes. Thus, it is proposed that HMG2 plays a role in modulatable gene expression, while HMG1 is associated with housekeeping functions.^ HI histone variants were also studied throughout spermatogenesis. The minor somatic variant, HIa, is the predominant variant in spermatogonia and early primary spermatocytes. In early pachytenes, the testis-specific variant, HIt, is first synthesized and appears, largely replacing somatic variants HIbcd and e by late pachytene stage. Early spermatids contain the same HI composition as pachytenes, but do not synthesize HI histones. HI('0) is present in low amounts in all germ cells. These results suggest that expression of HI variants is developmentally controlled.^

Functional requirements of histone deacetylases in Tup1-Ssn6 repression

The corepressor complex Tup1-Ssn6 regulates many classes of genes in yeast including cell type specific, glucose repressible, and DNA damage inducible. Tup1 and Ssn6 are recruited to target promoters through their interactions with specific DNA binding proteins such as α2, Mig1, and Crt1. Most promoters that are repressed by this corepressor complex exhibit a high degree of nucleosomal organization. This chromatin domain occludes transcription factor access to the promoter element resulting in gene repression. Previous work indicated that Tup1 interacts with underacetylated isoforms of H3 and H4, and that mutation of these histones synergistically compromises repression. These studies predict that Tup1-hypoacetyalted histone interaction is important to the repression mechanism, and in vivo hyperacetylation might compromise the corepressors ability to repress target genes. ^ One way to alter histone acetylation levels in vivo is to alter the balance between histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases. To date five histone deacetylases (HDACs) have been identified in yeast Rpd3, Hos1, Hos2, Hos3 and Hda1. Deletion of single or double HDAC genes had little to no effect on Tup1-Ssn6 repression, but simultaneous deletion of three specific activities Rpd3, Hos1, and Hos2 abolished repression in vivo. Promoter regions of Tup1-Ssn6 target genes in these triple deacetylase mutant cells are dramatically hyperacetylated in both H3 and H4. Examination of bulk histone acetylation levels showed that this specific HDAC triple mutant combination (rpd3 hos1 hos2) caused a dramatic and concomitant hyperacetylation of both H3 and H4. The loss of repression in the rpd3 hos1 hos2 cells, but not in other mutants, is consistent with previous observations, which indicate that histones provide redundant functions in the repression mechanism and that high levels of acetylation are required to prevent Tup1 binding. Investigation into a potential direct interaction between the Tup1-Ssn6 corepressor complex and one or more HDAC activities showed that both Rpd3 and Hos2 interact with the corepressor complex in vivo. These findings indicate that Tup1-Ssn6 repression involves the recruitment of histone deacetylase activities to target promoters, where they locally deacetylate histone residues promoting Tup1-histone tail interaction to initiate and/or maintain the repressed state. ^

Alteration of CEACAM1 gene transcription in prostate cancer cells: The role of AR, Sp2, and HDAC

Cell to cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM1), a type II tumor suppressor, has been found to be down-regulated in prostate cancer cells. The mechanism that causes CEACAM1's down-regulation in tumorigenesis is unknown. Here we show that the transcriptional activity of CEACAM1 is decreased in prostate cancer cells. This decrease is not due to methylation of the CEACAM1's promoter, but rather to the alteration of transcription factors regulating CEACAM1 expression. ^ Since androgen/androgen receptors (AR) are potent regulators of prostate growth and differentiation, their role on CEACAM1 gene transcription was examined. The androgen receptor could directly increase CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in a ligand dependent manner by interacting with an AR consensus element that resides in the CEACAM1 promoter. However, AR binding to the CEACAM1 promoter is not related to the loss of CEACAM1 during prostate cancer progression. ^ Further analysis enabled us to determine the particular region in the CEACAM1 promoter that mediates a decrease in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells. Upon further examination, we found that this CEACAM1 promoter region interacts with the Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3 transcription factors. However, only Sp2 expression was found to increase in prostate cancer cells. Inhibiting Sp2 from binding to the CEACAM1 promoter caused an increase in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells. In addition, over-expressing Sp2 in normal prostate cells resulted in a decrease in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity and endogenous protein expression. These observations suggest that Sp2 is a transcription repressor of CEACAM1. Furthermore, prostate cancer cells treated with trichostatin A (TSA), a specific histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, activated CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. This implies that HDACs are involved in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. Mutation of the Sp2 DNA binding region on the CEACAM1 promoter inhibited TSA activation of CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. This indicates that HDACs inhibit CEACAM1 transcriptional activity through Sp2. Base on these results, we propose that Sp2 is critical for down-regulating CEACAM1 expression, and one mechanism by which Sp2 represses CEACAM1 expression is by recruiting HDAC to the CEACAM1 promoter in prostate cancer cells. Collectively, these findings provide novel insights into mechanisms that cause the down-regulation of CEACAM1 expression in prostate cancer cells. ^

Involvement of histone H3 methylation in Tup1-Ssn6 repression

The Tup1-Ssn6 complex regulates the expression of diverse classes of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae including those regulated by mating type, DNA damage, glucose, and anaerobic stress. The complex is recruited to target genes by sequence-specific repressor proteins. Once recruited to particular promoters, it is not completely clear how it functions to block transcription. Repression probably occurs through interactions with both the basal transcriptional machinery and components of chromatin. Tup1 interactions with chromatin are strongly influenced by acetylation of histories H3 and H4. Tup1 binds to underacetylated histone tails and requires multiple histone deacetylases (HDACs) for its repressive functions. Like acetylation, histone methylation is involved in regulation of gene expression. The possible role of histone methylation in Tup1 repression is not known. Here we examined possible roles of histone methyltransferases in Tup1-Ssn6 functions. We found that like other genes, Tup1-Ssn6 target genes exhibit increases in the levels of histone H3 lysine 4 methylation upon activation. However, deletion of individual or multiple histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and other SET-domain containing genes has no apparent effect on Tup1-Ssn6 mediated repression of a number of well-defined targets. Interestingly, we discovered that Ssn6 interacts with Set2. Since deletion of SET2 does not affect Tup1-Ssn6 repression, Ssn6 may utilize Set2 in other contexts to regulate gene repression. In order examine if the two components of the Tup1-Ssn6 complex have independent functions in the cell, we identified genes differentially expressed in tup1Δ and ssn6Δ mutants using DNA microarrays. Our data indicate that ∼4% of genes in the cell are regulated by Ssn6 independently of Tup1. In addition, expression of genes regulated by Tup1-Ssn6 seems to be differently affected by deletion of Ssn6 and deletion of Tup1, which indicates that these components might have separate functions. Our data shed new light on the classical view of Tup1-Ssn6 functions, and indicate that Ssn6 might have repressive functions as well. ^

Requirement of GCN5 histone acetyltransferase in mouse neural tube closure and skeletal patterning

Histone acetylation plays an essential role in many DNA-related processes such as transcriptional regulation via modulation of chromatin structure. Many histone acetytransferases have been discovered and studied in the past few years, but the roles of different histone acetyltransferases (HAT) during mammalian development are not well defined at present. Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase is highly expressed until E16.5 during development. Previous studies in our lab using a constitutive null allele demonstrated that Gcn5 knock out mice are embryonic lethal, precluding the study of Gcn5 functions at later developmental stages. The creation of a conditional Gcn5 null allele, Gcn5flox allele, bypasses the early lethality. Mice homozygous for this allele are viable and appear healthy. In contrast, mice homozygous for a Gcn5 Δex3-18 allele created by Cre-loxP mediated deletion display a phenotype identical to our original Gcn5 null mice. Strikingly, a Gcn5flox(neo) allele, which contain a neomycin cassette in the second intron of Gcn5 is only partially functional and gives rise to a hypomorphic phenotype. Initiation of cranial neural tube closure at forebrain/midbrain boundary fails, resulting in an exencephaly in some Gcn5flox(neo)/flox(neo) embryos. These defects were found at an even greater penetrance in Gcn5flox(neo)/Δ embryos and become completely penetrant in the 129Sv genetic background, suggesting that Gcn5 controls mouse neural tube closure in a dose dependent manner. Furthermore, both Gcn5flox(neo)/flox(neo) and Gcn5 flox(neo)/Δ embryos exhibit anterior homeotic transformations in lower thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. These defects are accompanied by decreased expression levels and a shift in anterior expression boundary of Hoxc8 and Hoxc9. This study provides the first evidence that Gcn5 regulates Hox gene expression and is required for normal axial skeletal patterning in mice. ^

Molecular mechanisms by which p53/LSD1 and ERalpha/Trim24 complexes mediate gene regulation

In this dissertation, I identify two molecular mechanisms by which transcription factors cooperate with their co-regulators to mediate gene regulation. In the first part, I demonstrate that p53 directly recruits LSD1, a histone demethylase, to AFP chromatin to demethylate methylated H3K4 and actively mediate transcription repression. Loss of p53 and LSD1 interaction at chromatin leads to derepression of AFP in hepatic cells. In the second part, I reveal that Trim24 functions as an important co-activator in ERα-mediated gene activation in response to estrogen stimulation. Trim24 is recruited by ligand-bound ERα to chromatin and stabilizes ERα-chromatin interactions by binding to histone H3 via its PHD finger, which preferentially recognizes unmethylated H3K4. ^

TRIM24-REGULATED ESTROGEN RESPONSE IS DEPENDENT ON SPECIFIC HISTONE MODIFICATIONS IN BREAST CANCER CELLS

In this dissertation, I discovered that function of TRIM24 as a co-activator of ERα-mediated transcriptional activation is dependent on specific histone modifications in tumorigenic human breast cancer-derived MCF7 cells. In the first part, I proved that TRIM24-PHD finger domain, which recognizes unmethylated histone H3 lysine K4 (H3K4me0), is critical for ERα-regulated transcription. Therefore, when LSD1-mediated demethylation of H3K4 is inhibited, activation of TRIM24-regulated ERα target genes is greatly impaired. Importantly, I demonstrated that TRIM24 and LSD1 are cyclically recruited to estrogen responsive elements (EREs) in a time-dependent manner upon estrogen induction, and depletion of their expression exert corresponding time-dependent effect on target gene activation. I also identified that phosphorylation of histone H3 threonine T6 disrupts TRIM24 from binding to the chromatin and from activating ERα-regulated targets. In the second part, I revealed that TRIM24 depletion has additive effect to LSD1 inhibitor- and Tamoxifen-mediated reduction in survival and proliferation in breast cancer cells.